Salt Lake Metropolis would allow smaller, one-space occupancy units in the zones all over the town that are revealed in this article in distinctive colors. Metropolis planners are proposing to prevent enabling them in neighborhoods zoned one-spouse and children. Image courtesy of Salt Lake City Preparing

Salt Lake Town could see a return of dorm-model housing with shared living house between renters from distinct people in extra neighborhoods close to the city underneath a transform that is up for ultimate remark this week.

The up-to-date ordinance would effectively rebrand what has been known as single-room occupancy housing. Models with selected shared features would be termed shared housing if the council approves the variations this thirty day period.

The changes would additional than triple the quantity of land on which structures could be retrofitted or new shared housing could be developed, largely by together with industrial areas in Downtown, Poplar Grove, Glendale and Ballpark to the listing of permitted places in which shared housing could be positioned.

It is one of a number of strategies the city is using to try to produce much more reasonably priced housing. But even though it’s been proposed as a way to generate a lot more workforce and university student housing, the town nonetheless would not allow for shared housing in the regions adjacent to its biggest employer and source of college student housing have to have: the University of Utah.

The proposed ordinance wouldn’t increase the regions that permit shared housing into numerous rich locations that are zoned largely for single-household housing, inspite of a condition target and a need to have for blended-earnings housing citywide.

At the time a considerably popular sort of affordable housing through the metropolis and country, there are quite couple of examples of shared housing in the metropolis today.

Shared housing models below the current ordinance would be a minimum amount of 100 square ft for every unit, household tenants on a weekly or every month foundation and consist of a shared lavatory or shared kitchen (but not both of those).

Shared housing has been promoted as a way to add far more choices to the housing inventory to assistance avert folks from turning out to be homeless or to assist folks pull on their own out of homelessness. But metropolis officers have a short while ago focused on other citizens that could reward from the housing with shared features that logically would be fewer high-priced to create, very own, preserve or rent.

“A good deal of hard work or remark has been created that if the ordinance had been adopted it would be a great device to use to assistance folks who do not have housing now,” mentioned Russell Weeks, a community policy analyst for the Town Council. “But all over again a person of the significant ambitions of this proposed ordinance is to present workforce and scholar housing that is also inexpensive for young gentlemen and females who want to operate and go to college.”

District 6, which includes the East Bench and place about the U., is stuffed with single-loved ones zoning which does not permit single-room occupancy units and would not make it possible for it below the proposed changes.

Each individual other region in the town would improve the acreage on which shared housing could be created, in some cases considerably.

Downtown and District 2, which contains Poplar Grove and Glendale, would have the most land that would permit shared housing, adopted by parts of District 5.

And while the variations would convey geographical parity when evaluating the portions of the town east and west of Interstate 15, not every single neighborhood would make it possible for shared housing, which is viewed as a supply of probable criminal offense.

The increased Sugar Residence community currently prohibits solitary-room occupancy housing. It would permit shared housing on 143 acres of land less than the proposed ordinance transform.

Even though metropolis officials acknowledged the absence of citywide fairness, they most popular shifting forward with the change to promptly incorporate additional parts that enable most likely low-profits housing without going through a fight with wealthier neighborhoods.

The East Bench has a history of not attracting or welcoming economical housing. Not a solitary device of very low-profits housing has been developed in the district due to the fact 2016, though 1000’s of these units have been included somewhere else in the city in that time.

Passing the proposed adjust would carry on the craze.

That is mostly mainly because shared housing would not be allowed in solitary-spouse and children zoned neighborhoods.

District 5 would see the greatest proportionate raise of land in which shared housing could be constructed under the alter, but approximately all that growth would occur in the districts western part, which contains Ballpark.

District 2 would make it possible for shared housing largely alongside Redwood Street and 2100 South. Downtown would allow for it in most spots.

The city has reported it could round back again in the upcoming and search at increasing into the neighborhoods that will proceed prohibiting shared housing at an unspecified issue in time.

It doesn’t anticipate a huge hurry to develop shared housing, but will monitor progress.

Tuesday’s metropolis council conference is the final time people can comment on the changes before a most likely council vote.

Examine the most current personnel report in this article.

District 1 (Rose Park, Fairpark)

SROs would be clustered mainly close to North Temple from 900 West to 2200 West.

District 2 (Glendale, Poplar Grove)

SROs would be permitted on north/south corridors together I-15, Redwood Street and 5600 West, as well as together 2100 South.

District 3 (Avenues, Capitol Hill and Marmalade)

Sections of the Marmalade neighborhood west of 300 West would allow SROs, while all of Capitol Hill and all but one particular parcel of land in the Avenues wouldn’t supply the authorization.

District 4 (Downtown SLC)

Much of the city’s city main would enable the advancement of SROs.

District 5 (Liberty Wells, Central 9th, Ballpark, 9th and 9th)

SROs would be out there largely west of Condition Avenue. The 9th and 9th community, which is largely zoned Commercial Enterprise, wouldn’t enable SROs. Many infamous motels alongside Condition and Key streets could be converted to SROs, as has presently took place on a temporary basis at the Capitol Motel.

District 6 (East Bench, Yalecrest)

SROs would not be permitted in this East Bench district.

District 7 (Sugar Residence)

Sugar House would permit SROs mainly functioning east/west together 2100 South, as nicely as on both side of Highland Travel among 2100 South and I-80.

Nov. 9, 2020: This submit has been up-to-date to reflect that there is more than one particular case in point of shared housing in Salt Lake Town these days.

Interested in seeing the place developers are proposing and developing new flats in Salt Lake, or just want to assistance a area supply of information on what’s happening in your neighborhood? Find out more about becoming a member.